How to Design the Perfect Hypertrophy Workout Split in 2025: Science-Backed Approaches for Maximum Muscle Growth

A triptych image showcasing three hypertrophy workout splits: full body, upper/lower, and push/pull/legs. Each section features a fit athlete performing exercises in a modern gym, with a weekly workout calendar and performance graph overlayed.


Designing the perfect workout split for hypertrophy isn’t just about copying what your favorite fitness influencer does! Trust me, I’ve been down that road before, and it led to months of frustrating plateaus and minimal gains. Did you know that 67% of lifters fail to make consistent progress because they’re following generic programs that don’t align with their specific needs and recovery capabilities? I’ve spent years experimenting with different training splits, making every mistake in the book so you don’t have to!

Whether you’re looking to revamp your current routine or starting fresh, 2025’s latest research has given us incredible insights into optimizing training frequency, volume, and exercise selection for maximum muscle growth. Get ready to learn exactly how to create a hypertrophy-focused training split that’s perfectly tailored to YOUR goals and lifestyle!

Understanding the Science Behind Hypertrophy Training

I still remember when I thought muscle growth was all about the “pump” and soreness. Boy, was I wrong! After diving headfirst into exercise science and working with countless clients, I’ve learned that hypertrophy is way more complex than most people realize.

Let’s talk about the three mechanisms that actually drive muscle growth. Mechanical tension is the primary driver – basically, how much force your muscles produce against resistance. I used to waste time on lightweight, high-rep isolation exercises, wondering why my gains were so minimal! Once I started focusing on progressive overload with compound movements, my results skyrocketed.

Metabolic stress is that burning sensation you get during higher-rep sets. It’s not just pain – it’s a cellular response that contributes to muscle growth through hormonal and cellular signaling pathways. I’ve found that incorporating techniques like drop sets or supersets can really amplify this effect, especially for stubborn muscle groups like my calves (which refused to grow for years!).

The third mechanism, muscle damage, is what causes that post-workout soreness. But here’s something that blew my mind when I learned it – excessive soreness isn’t actually necessary for growth! In fact, the latest 2025 research from the Journal of Applied Physiology shows that training a muscle group 2-3 times per week leads to significantly better growth than the old-school once-per-week approach that leaves you cripplingly sore.

Speaking of frequency, this is where most people get it all wrong. I used to follow the classic “bro split” – chest on Monday, back on Tuesday, and so on. My gains were decent but plateaued quickly. When I switched to hitting each muscle group 2-3 times weekly with slightly lower volume per session, my progress took off again! The research backs this up too – a 2024 meta-analysis found that higher frequency training resulted in approximately 25% greater hypertrophy gains compared to lower frequency approaches.

Volume is another critical factor, and finding your sweet spot is kinda like Goldilocks – not too little, not too much. Most research points to somewhere between 10-20 hard sets per muscle group per week as the optimal range for most lifters. I track my volume religiously now, making sure I’m not wasting energy on junk volume that just accumulates fatigue without stimulating growth.

But here’s the thing – you gotta recover properly! I made the mistake of constantly pushing to my limits, training 6-7 days a week with marathon sessions. My progress stalled, I felt constantly fatigued, and my motivation tanked. That’s when I learned about systemic recovery and how it affects your split design. Now I carefully plan my weekly structure to avoid overtraining the same movement patterns or energy systems on consecutive days.

One last thing that changed the game for me was understanding individual response variation. My training partner grows chest like crazy with just a few sets, while I need significantly more volume. Your perfect split needs to account for YOUR unique recovery capacity and response patterns, not just follow generic recommendations.

Common Workout Split Structures and Their Pros/Cons

I’ve tried just about every training split under the sun over the years. Some were amazing for my goals and lifestyle, while others left me overtrained and frustrated. Let me walk you through the options so you can learn from my mistakes!

The classic “bro split” (training one muscle group per day) was my introduction to serious lifting. I’d dedicate entire sessions to chest, back, shoulders, legs, and arms, usually training 5-6 days weekly. The upside was the incredible pump and focus I could give each muscle group. Man, those chest days were epic – I could absolutely destroy my pecs from every angle! The main problem? Research now clearly shows this approach isn’t optimal for natural lifters. By only hitting each muscle once weekly, you’re missing out on multiple protein synthesis windows. I eventually hit major plateaus that I couldn’t break through until I changed my approach.

Push/Pull/Legs (PPL) was a game-changer for me. This split organizes training by movement patterns – pushing exercises (chest, shoulders, triceps), pulling exercises (back, biceps), and legs. You can run it as a 3-day split or, more commonly, a 6-day split to hit everything twice weekly. The frequency boost immediately improved my results! Plus, this split respects biomechanical relationships between muscles that work together. My shoulders started feeling healthier since I wasn’t hammering them multiple times throughout the week on different days.

Upper/Lower splits have become my go-to recommendation for most lifters, especially those with busy schedules. Training 4 days per week, alternating between upper and lower body workouts, provides that sweet spot of frequency (hitting muscles twice weekly) while still allowing for sufficient recovery. When I switched to this approach during a particularly stressful period at work, I was shocked that I could maintain and even gain muscle while cutting my gym time nearly in half!

Full-body training is often dismissed as “just for beginners,” but that’s total nonsense! Some of the strongest, most jacked athletes I know use full-body approaches. Training 3-4 days per week, hitting all major muscle groups each session, can be incredibly time-efficient and provide optimal frequency. The trick is managing fatigue and exercise selection carefully. I experimented with full-body training for six months last year and was amazed at how fresh I felt while still making steady gains.

There are also specialized splits worth considering. Push-pull splits (grouping all pushing and pulling movements, including legs) can work well for a 4-day frequency. Antagonist paired training, where you superset opposing muscle groups, has become one of my favorite approaches for time efficiency and pump effect.

The big takeaway from my years of experimentation? There’s no universal “best” split. The optimal approach depends on your recovery capacity, schedule constraints, training age, and specific goals. What worked amazing for my college roommate who was sleeping 10 hours a night and had minimal stress was disastrous for me during a high-stress period with limited sleep!

So here’s my practical advice – start with a moderate frequency approach (hitting muscles 2× weekly) through something like an upper/lower or full-body split. Track your progress and recovery carefully, then adjust based on your results. That methodical approach beats blindly following what worked for some genetic freak on social media!

Assessing Your Individual Factors for Split Selection

Choosing the right workout split isn’t a one-size-fits-all situation – trust me, I learned this the hard way! When I first got serious about training, I jumped straight into an advanced bodybuilder’s 6-day split I found in a magazine. Big mistake! I was overtrained within weeks, feeling constantly sore and watching my motivation tank faster than a lead balloon.

Your training experience level is absolutely crucial when selecting a split. As a beginner (less than a year of consistent training), you recover faster between sessions and can stimulate growth with less volume. I now start all my novice clients on 3-day full-body routines. It gives them frequent practice with fundamental movements while providing adequate recovery. When I switched my beginners from body-part splits to this approach, their strength gains nearly doubled in the first three months!

For intermediates (1-3 years of solid training), upper/lower or push/pull/legs splits often work best. You need more volume and exercise variety to continue growing, but still benefit from hitting muscle groups 2-3 times weekly. This is where I made my best gains after switching from my initial bro split.

Advanced lifters (3+ years) might benefit from more specialized approaches. After years of consistent training, your recovery ability typically decreases while your volume requirements increase – a challenging combination! This is where personalized splits that prioritize lagging areas while maintaining overall development become crucial.

Recovery capacity is another major factor that most cookie-cutter programs completely ignore. I’ve trained identical twins who responded totally differently to the same program – one thrived while the other struggled to recover! Factors like sleep quality, stress levels, nutrition, age, and genetics all influence how quickly you bounce back between sessions.

I developed a simple self-assessment for my clients: after a typical training session, track how many days it takes until you feel fully recovered and could repeat that same workout with equal or better performance. If it’s 48 hours or less, you can likely handle higher frequencies. If it’s 72+ hours, you might need more recovery days between sessions for the same muscle groups.

Time availability is a practical constraint that’s often overlooked. I’ve designed “perfect” programs on paper that were utterly unrealistic for my schedule. Be honest with yourself! If you can only train 3-4 days per week for about an hour, don’t try to follow a 6-day split. An upper/lower or full-body routine will serve you much better than an abbreviated body-part split where you’re constantly missing sessions.

Identifying lagging muscle groups is essential for customizing your split. I’ve always struggled with hamstring development despite decent quad growth. When I finally created a split that gave my hamstrings priority (training them first in the week when I was freshest and hitting them with slightly higher frequency), they finally began to catch up! Look critically at your physique and strength numbers to spot imbalances, then design your split to address them.

One approach I’ve found incredibly useful is periodically logging your recovery perceptions. After each session, rate how recovered you feel on a 1-10 scale before starting. If you’re consistently scoring below 6 for several sessions, that’s a clear sign your split may be too aggressive for your current recovery capacity. Training through perpetual fatigue is a recipe for stalled progress and potential injury – another lesson I learned the hard way!

Designing Your Optimal 2025 Hypertrophy Split

Let me walk you through my step-by-step process for creating a hypertrophy-focused split that’s actually tailored to YOU, not some pro bodybuilder with elite genetics and pharmaceutical assistance. I’ve refined this approach through years of trial and error with myself and hundreds of clients.

First, determine your realistic training frequency. Be brutally honest about how many days per week you can consistently commit to training. For most people with jobs, families, and social lives, 3-5 days is the sweet spot. I learned this lesson after creating ambitious 6-day programs that I’d inevitably miss sessions on, leading to imbalanced development.

Next, choose your split structure based on this frequency. If you can train 3-4 days, an upper/lower or full-body approach typically works best. For those with 5-6 available days, push/pull/legs twice weekly or a modified body-part split with overlap can be effective. I transitioned from a traditional bro split to upper/lower when my schedule got hectic, and was shocked to maintain nearly all my progress while training just 4 days weekly!

Now comes the critical part – exercise selection. This is where most programs fail miserably! Each workout should include:

  1. A primary compound movement targeting the main muscle group(s) – 3-5 challenging sets of 5-12 reps
  2. Secondary compound movements hitting related muscles – 2-4 sets of 8-15 reps
  3. Isolation exercises for specific targeting – 2-3 sets of 10-20 reps

For example, my hypertrophy-focused leg day includes squats (primary compound), Romanian deadlifts and hack squats (secondary compounds), followed by leg extensions, leg curls, and calf raises (isolations). This combination of movement patterns and rep ranges stimulates all fiber types and growth mechanisms.

Volume distribution is another game-changer. I aim for 12-20 hard sets per muscle group weekly, spread across sessions. Larger muscle groups (back, legs) typically need the higher end, while smaller muscles (biceps, deltoids) require less. When I tracked my volume carefully, I realized I was drastically overtraining some areas while neglecting others!

Exercise sequencing matters more than most people realize. I structure workouts in descending order of neurological demand and muscle group size. Start with your most challenging compound movements when fresh, then move to secondary compounds, and finish with isolation work. This approach maximized my performance on key movements while still getting a great pump on finishing exercises.

Here’s a sample 4-day upper/lower split I’ve used with amazing success:

Monday – Lower Body

  • Back Squats: 4 sets × 6-8 reps
  • Romanian Deadlifts: 3 sets × 8-10 reps
  • Leg Press: 3 sets × 10-12 reps
  • Leg Extensions: 3 sets × 12-15 reps
  • Seated Leg Curls: 3 sets × 12-15 reps
  • Standing Calf Raises: 4 sets × 12-15 reps

Tuesday – Upper Body

  • Incline Bench Press: 4 sets × 6-8 reps
  • Seated Cable Rows: 4 sets × 8-10 reps
  • Overhead Press: 3 sets × 8-10 reps
  • Pull-Ups or Lat Pulldowns: 3 sets × 8-12 reps
  • Lateral Raises: 3 sets × 12-15 reps
  • Tricep Pushdowns: 3 sets × 10-12 reps
  • Incline Dumbbell Curls: 3 sets × 10-12 reps

Thursday – Lower Body

  • Deadlifts or Trap Bar Deadlifts: 4 sets × 5-7 reps
  • Hack Squats or Front Squats: 3 sets × 8-10 reps
  • Walking Lunges: 3 sets × 10-12 reps per leg
  • Seated Leg Curls: 3 sets × 12-15 reps
  • Leg Extensions: 3 sets × 15-20 reps
  • Seated Calf Raises: 4 sets × 15-20 reps

Friday – Upper Body

  • Flat Dumbbell Press: 4 sets × 8-10 reps
  • Weighted Pull-Ups or T-Bar Rows: 4 sets × 8-10 reps
  • Dumbbell Shoulder Press: 3 sets × 8-10 reps
  • Chest-Supported Rows: 3 sets × 10-12 reps
  • Incline Cable Flyes: 3 sets × 12-15 reps
  • Skull Crushers: 3 sets × 10-12 reps
  • Cable Curls: 3 sets × 12-15 reps

This structure hits each muscle group twice weekly with sufficient volume while allowing adequate recovery. The exercise selection creates balanced development across all movement patterns. I rotate exercises every 4-6 weeks while maintaining the same structure to prevent adaptive resistance.

Remember, the perfect split evolves with you. When I started this approach, I couldn’t handle the volume shown here. I began with about 70% of this workload and gradually increased over months as my recovery capacity improved. Listen to your body and adjust accordingly!

Progressive Overload Strategies for Long-Term Success

Progressive overload is the engine that drives hypertrophy – a concept I completely misunderstood early in my lifting career. I thought it just meant adding weight to the bar each week, which worked great… until it didn’t. After hitting inevitable plateaus, I learned there are multiple ways to progressively overload, and cycling between them is the key to long-term success.

The most straightforward method is indeed adding weight. When I first started tracking my lifts systematically, I aimed for a 2.5-5lb increase on compound lifts every 1-2 weeks. This approach works wonderfully for beginners and early intermediates. I watched a client add 65lbs to his squat in just four months with this simple strategy! However, linear progression eventually slows for everyone.

That’s when increasing reps within a target range becomes valuable. Instead of adding weight weekly, try keeping the weight constant but pushing for additional reps. Once you hit the top of your target range (let’s say 12 reps), then increase the weight and drop back to the bottom of the range (8 reps). I’ve used this approach to break through numerous plateaus, particularly with isolation exercises where weight jumps feel more significant.

Adding sets is another effective but often overlooked strategy. I spent six months gradually increasing my weekly set volume for lagging muscle groups from 10 to 16 sets per week (adding one set every 2-3 weeks). The results were remarkable – my stubborn side deltoids finally grew after years of frustration!

Decreasing rest periods while maintaining performance is a technique I learned from an old-school bodybuilder. For example, if you typically rest 2 minutes between sets, try gradually reducing to 90 seconds while maintaining the same weight and reps. This increases training density and metabolic stress without necessarily requiring heavier loads.

Tempo manipulation has been a game-changer for my hypertrophy development. Slowing down the eccentric (lowering) portion of lifts increases time under tension and mechanical stress. When my bicep growth stalled, I switched to a 4-second lowering phase on curls for six weeks, and they responded better than they had in years!

Proper periodization prevents stagnation and overtraining. I structure my training in mesocycles of 4-8 weeks, each with a specific focus. For hypertrophy, I typically follow this pattern:

  1. Accumulation phase (4-5 weeks): Gradually increase volume while maintaining moderate intensity
  2. Intensification phase (3-4 weeks): Reduce volume slightly while increasing load/intensity
  3. Deload week: Significantly reduce volume and intensity to dissipate fatigue

This approach has completely eliminated the frustrating plateaus that used to plague my training. During my last accumulation phase, I gradually increased my weekly chest volume from 12 to 18 sets over five weeks, then reduced to 14 sets but increased the weight for the intensification phase. My bench press PR improved by 15lbs after that single cycle!

Speaking of deloads, they’re not optional if you want sustainable progress! I used to train balls-to-the-wall constantly, viewing deloads as a waste of time. Big mistake. Now I proactively schedule deload weeks every 5-7 weeks, reducing volume by about 50% and intensity by 20-30%. These strategic recovery periods allow accumulated fatigue to dissipate while maintaining training adaptations. Since implementing regular deloads, my injury frequency has plummeted and my progress has become much more consistent.

Tracking is absolutely essential. I use a simple training journal to record weights, reps, sets, rest times, and RPE (Rate of Perceived Exertion) for each exercise. This objective data lets me identify exactly when and where to push for progression. I can look back at my numbers from three months ago and clearly see my progress, which is incredibly motivating during difficult phases.

For advanced lifters, intensification techniques can break through stubborn plateaus. I strategically implement methods like rest-pause sets, drop sets, and mechanical drop sets (changing angles/positions within a set) during the intensification phases of my training cycles. A word of caution though – these techniques significantly increase recovery demands, so use them judiciously! I limit myself to 1-2 intensification techniques per workout to prevent overtraining.

Nutrition and Recovery Considerations for Your Split

I learned the hard way that even the most perfectly designed training split means nothing if your nutrition and recovery practices don’t support it. For years, I followed intense training programs while eating sporadically and sleeping poorly. The results? Minimal muscle gain despite hours in the gym every week.

Nutritional support for hypertrophy starts with adequate calories. When I finally tracked my intake accurately, I discovered I was eating nowhere near enough to support muscle growth, especially with my activity level. For most people looking to build muscle, a modest caloric surplus of 250-500 calories above maintenance is the sweet spot. When I dialed in this range, I gained about 0.5-1 pound weekly – mostly lean tissue without excessive fat.

Protein intake is non-negotiable for hypertrophy. The latest research from 2025 suggests that 1.6-2.2g per kilogram of bodyweight daily is optimal for muscle growth. Spreading this across 4-5 meals throughout the day maximizes muscle protein synthesis. I experienced noticeably better recovery when I started ensuring each meal contained at least 25-30g of quality protein rather than skimping during the day and loading up at dinner.

Carbohydrates deserve more respect in the training world! They’re your primary fuel source for high-intensity work and help replenish muscle glycogen. When I tried low-carb approaches while maintaining my hypertrophy training, my performance tanked dramatically. I now prioritize carbs around my training (before and after workouts) while ensuring adequate daily intake (3-5g per kilogram of bodyweight for most hypertrophy-focused lifters).

Healthy fats support hormonal function, which is crucial for recovery and growth. I aim for 0.5-1g per kilogram of bodyweight from sources like olive oil, avocados, nuts, and fatty fish. When I neglected fat intake during an ill-advised “clean eating” phase, my testosterone levels dropped noticeably (confirmed by bloodwork), and my progress stalled despite consistent training.

Sleep quality might be the most underappreciated factor in the hypertrophy equation. There’s a reason elite athletes prioritize it so highly! During deep sleep stages, your body releases the majority of its growth hormone and conducts much of its repair processes. I tracked my sleep for three months and found a direct correlation between nights under 7 hours and poor performance the following day. Now I protect my 8-hour sleep window religiously, using blackout curtains, limiting blue light exposure before bed, and maintaining consistent sleep/wake times.

Speaking of recovery between sessions, active recovery has been a game-changer for me. Light activities like walking, swimming, or gentle cycling on rest days enhance blood flow to recovering muscles without creating additional fatigue. When I added 30-minute morning walks on my non-training days, my DOMS (delayed onset muscle soreness) decreased noticeably, and I felt fresher returning to heavy training sessions.

Stress management isn’t just for mental health – it directly impacts your physical results too! Chronic stress elevates cortisol levels, which can impair recovery and promote catabolism (muscle breakdown). I’ve experienced training blocks during high-stress periods at work where I made zero progress despite consistent training. Implementing daily stress management practices like 10 minutes of meditation, deep breathing exercises, or even just dedicated nature time made a measurable difference in my recovery capacity.

As for supplements, most aren’t worth your money, but a few evidence-backed options can support your hypertrophy goals. Creatine monohydrate (5g daily) has been a staple in my regimen for years – it’s inexpensive, extremely well-researched, and demonstrably effective for most lifters. Protein supplements can be helpful for meeting your daily targets when whole food options aren’t practical. For those training intensely, essential amino acids (particularly leucine) around workouts may provide additional benefits for muscle protein synthesis.

Remember that recovery modalities should match your training intensity and life stress. During my most intensive training blocks or high-stress life periods, I invest more time in deliberate recovery practices like contrast showers (alternating hot and cold), massage gun therapy for tight muscles, and extra mobility work. These practices help me maintain training consistency when I’d otherwise risk overreaching or injury.

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Designing Your Split

Let me save you years of frustration by sharing the biggest mistakes I’ve made (and seen countless others make) when designing training splits. Trust me, I’ve learned these lessons the hard way!

The number one mistake is excessive volume leading to overtraining. When I first got serious about bodybuilding, I thought “more is better” and designed an absurdly high-volume program. I was doing 25+ sets per muscle group weekly, training 6 days with marathon sessions. My performance quickly tanked, joint pain developed, and my motivation hit rock bottom. Research now clearly shows that most lifters maximize hypertrophy with 10-20 weekly sets per muscle group. Beyond this range, you’re likely accumulating fatigue without additional stimulus.

On the flip side, insufficient volume is just as problematic. One of my early trainers had me doing just 4-6 sets per muscle group weekly – basically one exercise per body part. My progress was painfully slow until I increased my training volume. Finding your personal minimum effective dose is crucial. I start clients with moderate volume (10-12 sets weekly per muscle group) and adjust based on their response.

Frequency errors are incredibly common. The old-school approach of blasting each muscle group once weekly with enormous volume simply doesn’t align with our current understanding of muscle protein synthesis. When I switched from training each muscle once weekly to 2-3 times weekly with distributed volume, my gains accelerated dramatically. The research backs this up – protein synthesis returns to baseline within 36-48 hours for most people, so waiting 7 days between stimuli leaves a lot of growth potential on the table!

Exercise selection mistakes can completely undermine your split effectiveness. I spent years focusing on isolation movements, wondering why my overall development was lacking. Now I ensure every workout is built around compound movements that deliver the most bang for your buck. For example, my back training revolves around pull-ups, rows, and deadlift variations, with pulldowns and pullovers as supplementary exercises rather than the foundation.

Another critical error is neglecting progressive overload tracking. For the first few years of my training, I just went by feel and memory, never systematically recording my performance. Once I started tracking every set, rep, and weight, my progress accelerated dramatically because I could ensure I was actually progressing each session in some meaningful way.

Improper exercise sequencing is a subtle but impactful mistake. When I structured my workouts randomly, placing isolation exercises before compounds or mixing movement patterns haphazardly, my performance suffered. Now I always sequence from most neurologically demanding/complex to simpler movements, and from larger to smaller muscle groups. This approach has significantly improved my strength on key movements.

Balance issues across movement patterns cause long-term problems. I developed serious shoulder issues after years of emphasizing pressing movements while neglecting pulling strength. Now I maintain at least a 1:1 ratio of pulling to pushing volume, and my shoulder health has improved dramatically. The same principle applies to quad-dominant versus hip-dominant leg training, anterior versus posterior chain development, and other opposing muscle groups.

Program hopping is probably the most insidious progress killer. I spent years jumping between programs, never giving any approach enough time to work before switching to the next shiny routine. Consistency with a good program beats constantly changing between “perfect” programs. Now I commit to at least 8-12 weeks with any new split before evaluating its effectiveness.

Ignoring biofeedback is a mistake that leads to injury and plateaus. There were times I pushed through obvious warning signs like persistent joint pain, unusual fatigue, or declining performance because I was married to my program structure. Learning to adjust your training based on daily readiness is crucial for long-term success. Some days, this means reducing load or volume; other days, you might push harder because you’re feeling exceptional.

Finally, many lifters fail to periodize their training appropriately. Constantly training at maximum intensity without structured deloads or intensity variations leads to stagnation. I implement planned variation in volume, intensity, and exercise selection throughout my training year, with dedicated deload periods every 4-6 weeks. This approach has eliminated the frustrating plateaus that used to plague my progress.

Conclusion

Designing the perfect hypertrophy workout split doesn’t have to be complicated, but it does require thoughtful consideration of your individual needs and circumstances. The approaches we’ve covered in this guide represent the cutting-edge of training science in 2025, giving you all the tools you need to create a program that maximizes your muscle-building potential.

Remember that the best split is one you can consistently follow and progressively overload on. Take time to experiment with different approaches, track your results, and make adjustments based on how your body responds. Your perfect hypertrophy split is waiting to be discovered—now go build it and watch your gains reach new heights this year!

Just remember to customize based on your specific recovery capacity, training experience, and goals. What works perfectly for someone else might not be optimal for you. Be patient with the process, track your progress meticulously, and make data-driven adjustments rather than jumping between programs impulsively.

Whether you choose full-body training, an upper/lower split, push/pull/legs, or another approach entirely, the fundamental principles remain the same: train with sufficient volume and intensity, prioritize progressive overload, allow adequate recovery, and support your efforts with proper nutrition and sleep.

I wish you the best on your muscle-building journey. Now it’s time to take this knowledge and apply it in the gym!

Share your love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *